How to Improve Your Credit Score Fast (2025 Step-by-Step Guide)
For California employers, the risk of employee-related claims (such as discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination or wage-hour violations) means that carrying employment practices liability insurance (EPLI) is increasingly seen as essential. In 2025, many insurers recommend a **minimum limit of at least US$250,000** for small/medium firms in the state—even though there is no statutory “minimum” in law. ([iiabcal.org](https://www.iiabcal.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/iiabcal-031125-epli-application.pdf))
EPLI policies typically cover defence costs and settlements arising from employment-related claims by current, former or prospective employees. Key coverages include:
While there is no legally prescribed “minimum” EPLI limit in California, brokers and programers in the state suggest the following as a baseline for smaller enterprises:
| Firm size / risk profile | Suggested minimum policy limit | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1-50 employees, limited exposures | US$250K – US$500K | Handles one or two claims without catastrophic cost. |
| 50-200 employees or somewhat higher risk | US$500K – US$1 million | More coverage buffer as cost of claims is higher. |
| 200+ employees or heavy wage-hour exposure (e.g., California-based operations) | US$1 million+ (often US$2 million) | Large exposures, regulatory actions, class-actions possible. |
Many clients, vendors or government contracts now demand that the supplier carry a certain EPLI limit (often US$1 million). In California especially, given aggressive wage-hour enforcement, an employer may find themselves negotiating client contracts that state minimum limits of $1 m or higher. Emerging demands include:
When choosing a limit, you should weigh the premium cost against your exposure. A higher limit will increase premium but can mitigate catastrophic exposure. Consider the following numeric mini-case studies:
Company A: 25-employee tech-start-up based in San Diego. No prior employment claims. They purchase a US$250K limit policy at an annual premium of US$2,000. One harassment claim arises costing defence + settlement = US$180K → fully covered under policy.
Company B: 120-employee hospitality group in Los Angeles. They buy a US$500K limit policy at annual premium US$7,000. A wage-hour class-action costs US$850K; policy covers US$500K, leaving US$350K self-funded.
Company C: 1,000-employee manufacturing operation in California. They opt for a US$2 million limit policy at US$25,000 per year. A harassment and discrimination class-action settles for US$1.6 million—fully covered, proving the higher premium worthwhile.
No. California law does not mandate EPLI coverage. However, insurers often suggest at least a US$250K limit in 2025 to mitigate common risks. ([iiabcal.org](https://www.iiabcal.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/iiabcal-031125-epli-application.pdf))
Some policies offer limited or sub-limited wage-hour coverage. Review your policy to confirm if these claims are included. ([calwestins.com](https://www.calwestins.com/blog/understanding-epli-coverage-in-california-wage-and-hour-law-and-wrongful-employment-practices/))
US$500K–US$1 million is typical for California mid-size employers. Larger firms or those with heavy wage-hour risk should consider US$2 million or more.
Premiums typically range from US$1,500–US$3,000 for small businesses, up to US$25,000+ for large employers depending on limit, industry, and claims history.
Yes. Many contracts require vendors to hold at least US$1 million EPLI with specific endorsements. Always verify contractual insurance terms before renewal.
Comments
Post a Comment